What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?
Jul 07, · What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie? By Gary Taubes. July 7, ; See the article in its original context from July 7, , Section 6, Page 22 Buy Reprints. View on timesmachine. What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie? By Gary Taubes If the members of the American medical establishment were to have a collective find-yourself-standing-naked-in-Times-Square-type nightmare, this might .
They spend 30 years ridiculing Robert Atkins, author of the phenomenally-best-selling ''Dr. Atkins' Diet Revolution'' and ''Dr. Atkins' New Diet Revolution,'' accusing the Manhattan doctor of quackery and fraud, only to discover that the unrepentant Atkins was right all along. Or maybe it's this: they find that their very own dietary recommendations -- eat less fat and more carbohydrates -- are the cause of the rampaging epidemic of obesity in America. Or, just possibly this: they find out both of the above are true.
When Atkins first published his ''Diet Revolution'' inAmericans were just coming to terms with the proposition that fat -- particularly the whaat fat of meat and dairy products -- was the primary nutritional evil in the American diet. Atkins managed to sell millions of copies of a book promising that we would lose weight eating steak, eggs and butter to our heart's desire, because it was the carbohydrates, the pasta, rice, bagels and sugar, that caused obesity and even heart disease.
Fat, he how long has tom brady been in the nfl, was harmless. Atkins allowed his readers to eat ''truly luxurious foods without limit,'' as he put it, ''lobster with butter sauce, steak with bearnaise sauce. Atkins banned even fruit juices, and permitted only ft modicum of vegetables, although the latter were negotiable as the diet progressed. Atkins was by no means the first to get rich pushing a high-fat diet that restricted carbohydrates, but he popularized it to an extent that the American Medical Association considered it a potential threat to our health.
The Ffat. Thirty years later, America has become how to get pre-qualified for a mortgage polarized bg the subject of weight. On what is the name of jesus in islam one hand, we've been told with almost religious certainty by everyone from the surgeon general on down, and we have come to believe with almost religious certainty, that obesity is caused by the excessive consumption of fat, and that if we eat less fat we will lose weight and live longer.
On the other, we have the ever-resilient message of Atkins and decades' worth of best-selling diet books, including ''The Zone,'' ''Sugar Busters'' and ''Protein Power'' to name a few. All push some variation of what scientists would call the alternative hypothesis: it's not the fat that makes us fat, but the carbohydrates, and if we eat less carbohydrates we will lose weight and live longer.
The perversity of this alternative what fertilizer to use for lychee trees is that it identifies the cause of waas as precisely those refined carbohydrates at the base of the famous Food Guide Pyramid -- the pasta, rice and bread -- that we are told should be the staple of our healthy low-fat diet, and then on the sugar or corn syrup bgi the soft drinks, fruit juices and sports drinks that we have taken to consuming in quantity if for no other reason than that they are fat free and so appear intrinsically healthy.
While the low-fat-is-good-health dogma represents reality as we have come to know it, and the government has spent hundreds of millions of dollars in research trying to prove its worth, ibg low-carbohydrate message has been relegated to the realm of unscientific fantasy. Over the past five years, however, there has been a subtle shift in the scientific consensus.
It used to be that even considering the possibility of the alternative hypothesis, let alone researching it, was tantamount to quackery by association. Now a small but growing minority of establishment researchers have come to take seriously what the low-carb-diet doctors have been saying all along. Walter Willett, chairman of the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, may be the most visible proponent of testing this heretic It makes me wonder about all of the other "religions" out there Tree huggers preventing clear cutting and watching the trees burn.
Eco freaks preventing drilling for our own oil and watching the countries that pollute and use the money to attack us. Gun grabbers taking our Second Amendment rights and watching crime increasing. If a lot of people believe something for a long time, it doesn't make it right. Every single time it's tried. The problem is, it takes time to adjust one's eating patterns to ignore the carb cravings and, instead, stuff your face with meat and cheese.
The medical community will eventually realize that sugar is a bigger killer than tobacco. The "caveman diet" will help you lose weight quickly and feel much better in the process. AH HA! I KNEW it wasn't the tobacco.
Sugar is too expensive nowadays for most food processors. Corn syrup doesn't seem as satisfying as sugar therefore we want to eat more. It is probably a reason why we have more allergies due to increased intake of corn products.
She lost a lot of weight but it trashed her blood chemistry. Her total cholesterol was what is arp in networking above and her tri-gly were over The doctor thought it was a flawed result and she had a second test at another blood lab. It came back with nearly the same results.
When she switched to a diet of moderation that included some carbs, lean meats, fruits and veggies her numbers dropped in half. It might be a freak occurance but I'll never take that chance.
As a diabetic convert to low carb, in my new trimmed down state, 30 pounds lighterI have challenged the American Diabetic Assn on their recommendations which are carb based. The silence is deafening. The is not one, NOT EVEN ONE successful study in all these years, despite the millions of dollars spent in this country and abroad trying to link a high fat high protein diet, read Atkins hereto coronary heart disease.
My cholesterol borderline dropped 15 points as well! I love popcorn, but I never eat it within three hours of a meal. I've managed to keep the weight off. The hardest thing to do, however, is to break that carb addiction, which is exactly what it is. My triglicerides dropped from to 56, my total cholesterol went down, and my ratio of bad to good cholesterol, as well as total to good chol.
It might not work for everyone, but I know people that have really benefitted from it. Fat RINOs eating blubber to stay healthy. Who would have ever thought that even one of them had that much commonsense. A billion Hindu adherents in How to grow chrysanthemums indoors say it's wrong to eat beef.
A billion Muslim adherents world wide say it's wrong to eat pork. When does majority vote constitute scientific proof of anything? Atkins can wnat my butt. There's enough anecdotal evidence to stir doubt among fah medical community that eating "low fat" is actually having the opposite effect. I know enough people who have dropped carbs and eat "the caveman diet" that qhat convinced me that sugar is dangerous and fat is not. Why do you think farmers feed grain and potatoes to animals?
Careful Saundra, you are really hanging out in the breeze asking for riotous comments with this one. You want to join the Bod a Thon? We've decided to head the President's call to get healthier. Both are bad, in my anecdotal view. What exactly do waw mean by "screwed up"? Atkins advises anyone starting his diet to have a full lipid panel done at the outset of the diet, then again in 60 days and then again in 60 days.
I don't know anyone and I know about 10 people on Atkins or a fta diet plan who followed a low carb regimen who didn't see a marked and sustained improvement in those numbers. I brought my triglycerides from over to about on the diet. How long was your friend on the diet?
I got so constipated I thought I would die! So there. Now you've made me embarrass myself in front of the whole freepin' world! Amen to that! My blood sugar was out of control. I couldn't keep it under and I was spiking to lf My mother spent weeks in a diabetic coma and I was afraid I was heading for the same thing.
I went on the Atkins diet and started a daily workout and lost over lbs. The Atkins diet cured my diabetes symptoms I had sleep apnea and used a Cpap debive to sleep, but no more and I was on what food do tudors eat for acid reflux I think Dr.
Atkins helped to save my life. So, eat some apricots or prunes or plums. I never gave up fruit; so I didn't reach ketosis. That means I lost weight slower. I also didn't give up wine either. But eliminating starchy carbs like bread and potatoes and corn helped me lose 15 pounds in three months. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. When so many fag are wrong for so long, it becomes a religion.
My wife has been trying to feed me pie low fat diet for years, but I have resisted. What diseases do they test for when donating blood guess I wasn't fooled.
The low-carb approach works. Actually we eat more corn syrup than sugar as a sweetener source I had a friend on the Atkins diet. Absolutely right.
I did Atkins last year to drop 15 pounds and, guess what? Wish I had seen your post before posting. I don't see any evidence at all here that Atkins has any "proof" at all on his side except the fact that people like wss believe it's okay to eat fat and meat, and like to buy a book that tells them it's okay to do that. I lost ten pounds in two weeks on the Atkins diet but my system got so screwed up it took several months to get over it, and I put all the weight back on.
Hint: it ain't to make 'em skinny.
Leave a comment
In he made the Atkins diet once again a smash hit with a sensational lead article in the Times Magazine, 'What if it's all been a big fat lie?' (30). He amasses the evidence against dietary. Nov 23, · In July , The New York Times Magazine published “What If It’s All Been a Big Fat Lie?,” a cover story by food journalist Gary Taubes arguing that the carbohydrates in our diets, not the fat. May 29, · lovemedat.com Internationally renowned natural health phy.
The Atkins diet is all protein; lots of meat, a little vegetables and no fruit - many doctors say that's it's not just unhealthy but even dangerous. Many sources that Taubes talked to too tells that he just ignored them because what they said because it didn't fit his idea. Or they were surprised about his conclusions from what they told him.
Comment from Taubas: Yeah, well. I don't think that guy is really a scientist. Or I don't like that guy. Fleming said that is unequivocally wrong. This was the research that we did here. But that is how Taubes said that data like this make him feel. He said that he "doesn't trust Fleming. Before deciding that Squires got it right and that Taubes got it wrong, you might consider reading Taubes response published in the Washington Post on September 24, Sally Squires's Aug.
While it's impossible in limited space to rectify all the copious misrepresentations in her story, the following clarifies key issues. My NYT article questioned the common belief that obesity is caused by excess calorie consumption from fat, and instead suggested an alternative hypothesis: "It's not the fat that makes us fat, but the carbohydrates.
It questioned whether all this was coincidence or cause and effect. My primary disagreement with Squires and public health authorities such as National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute director Claude Lenfant arises from our divergent views of how good science is done. Squires and the public health establishment act as if reliable knowledge is established by proving the validity of hypotheses, and that this is accomplished by accumulating all positive evidence supporting the hypotheses and rejecting all non-supportive, negative evidence.
I side with Francis Bacon and Carl Popper, who argued that reliable knowledge comes by rigorously testing hypothesis, and that such tests require more weight be given to negative evidence than to positive evidence. My NYT article noted that copious evidence exists in contradiction to the low-fat-is-good-health hypothesis, while the alternative hypothesis may fit the data better but has never been adequately tested. Moreover, Squires apparently believes that learned expert committees and government agencies are incapable of arriving at biased and incorrect conclusions on subjects of national importance, or at least on this particular subject.
I believe they can and, in this case, that they probably did. Squires faults me for ignoring "high-quality," "significant and well-known peer reviewed research," including the Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee DGAC. The report cites "many years of epidemiological research" supporting the dangers of saturated fats, although the one relevant article both it and Squires discuss in detail was not published in a peer-reviewed journal, begging the question of whether it constitutes "high-quality research.
Squires describes one of my "key assertions" as suggesting "that eating saturated fat can be beneficial to the heart. The article said "saturated fats are not nearly as deleterious as you would think," and that lard, for instance, has more "good fats" -- monounsaturated and polyunsaturated -- than "bad fats" -- saturated.
Thus, the overall effect on cholesterol profiles of eating lard rather than refined carbohydrates or starches would be at worst harmless.
Squires quotes my article, but changes the meaning by eliding key phrases and replacing them with ellipses. She then describes Walter Willett as disagreeing with my assessment, which is only true if you delete what Squires indeed did delete from the quote.
Squires says I reject the findings of The Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, due to my "negative personal assessment of the panel's chair. Nor do I reject the findings. The report actually concludes that low-fat diets do not work.
It says reducing calories is crucial to successful weight loss, something we both agree on, then says on page 95 in English "Reducing dietary fat alone without reducing calories is not sufficient for weight loss. However, reducing dietary fat, along with reducing dietary carbohydrates can facilitate caloric reduction. Squires says I disagree with the findings of the Diabetes Prevention Study. This is incorrect. I disagree with Squires's interpretation of the findings: that the DPP data are compelling evidence for the efficacy of low-fat diets.
The DPP reported that low-fat low-calorie diets and minutes of weekly exercise produced a 5 percent to 7 percent weight-loss 15 to 21 pounds for a pounder over six years. Because the study included no control group for the dietary arm, for all we know exercise and a low-carbohydrate low-calorie diet might have produced much greater weight loss.
Implying that this data confirms the efficacy of a low-fat diet is sophistic. Passing this kind of sophistry off as good science is common in this field and its media coverage and is regrettable. Finally, Squires reports my skepticism of research by Dr. Richard Fleming without giving the context.
As I explained at length to Squires, clinical trials are expensive, difficult and time-consuming. Even small dietary trials can easily cost several hundred thousand dollars and require entire research teams.
Fleming reports on a one-year trial of participants and four diets with extensive follow-up. His paper, however, has no co-authors; it acknowledges no source of funding, nor any nurses, dietitians or technicians who might have helped.
As for the issue of peer-review, Fleming states that his patients "were randomly assigned to one of the four dietary regimens based upon dietary preferences. If they were randomly assigned, then their preferences must be irrelevant. The two methods are incompatible. If this paper was peer-reviewed, it was done poorly. If this constitutes high-quality research in this field, then I suggest even more skepticism is necessary. Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
The whole article goes like: Research project a showed that a low fat diet works. Yes, he really does suggest that Tags : food. Before deciding that Squires got it right and that Taubes got it wrong, you might consider reading Taubes response published in the Washington Post on September 24, Sally Squires's Aug.
Gary Taubes Venice, Calif. Leave a comment. Email Address. Remember personal info? Subscribe to this blog's feed. Powered by Movable Type Pro.